{"id":474,"date":"2025-09-08T21:53:34","date_gmt":"2025-09-08T21:53:34","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/globaltaalenthq.com\/?p=474"},"modified":"2025-09-15T08:52:24","modified_gmt":"2025-09-15T08:52:24","slug":"house-intel-democrats-launch-probe-into-trump-revocation-of-security-clearances","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/globaltaalenthq.com\/index.php\/2025\/09\/08\/house-intel-democrats-launch-probe-into-trump-revocation-of-security-clearances\/","title":{"rendered":"House Intel Democrats launch probe into Trump revocation of security clearances"},"content":{"rendered":"
Democrats on the House Intelligence Committee on Monday launched a probe into the Trump administration\u2019s decision to revoke 37 officials\u2019 security clearances<\/a>, and questioned the rationale behind listing them publicly.<\/p>\n Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard last month stripped clearances from a number of current and former intelligence officials who have ties to the Biden administration or have spoken out against Trump policies.<\/p>\n Gabbard, without evidence, accused those listed of politicizing or leaking intelligence or \u201ccommitting intentional egregious violations of tradecraft standards.\u201d<\/p>\n Rep. Jim Himes (D-Conn.), the top Democrat on the panel, asked for \u201cthe specific evidence\u201d behind each of the revocations.<\/p>\n \u201cIf there is evidence of misconduct to warrant revoking the clearances of these 37 individuals, some of whom were senior IC officers at the time of your memo, it would indicate a systemic issue in the granting of security clearances. It is hard to imagine an issue more deserving of congressional oversight and corrective action,\u201d Himes wrote in a letter to Gabbard<\/a> signed by all Democratic members on the panel.<\/p>\n \u201cIf, however, these revocations occurred outside of established process and don\u2019t reflect fundamental risk, an immense amount of IC knowledge and capability has been lost.\u201d<\/p>\n The letter noted that at least one of those listed had been serving undercover at the time of the announcement, and questioned why Gabbard\u2019s office would make a public announcement concerning the matter.<\/p>\n Others on the list included those who Himes said have key skillsets or are working on top priorities for the intelligence community.<\/p>\n \u201cAt least two of the individuals listed in the memo are currently employed as congressional staff, raising serious separation of powers concerns,\u201d he wrote. <\/p>\n